Endoskopie 2011; 20(1): 24-28

Da Vinci sacrocolpopexy in urogenital prolapse surgery

MUDr.Daniel Struppl
Oddělení operační gynekologie a minimálně invazivní chirurgie Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha

The surgical repair of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) has a major role to play nowadays, but due to aging of the population will be even

more important in the future. There are many innovative changes in the concept of POP surgery during last decade, especially in

new techniques and implants to reach the optimal tissue support. The POP is a multicompartmental disorder and usually consists of

urethrocele, cystocele, uterine or vaginal vault prolapse, enterocoele or rectocele. We summarize the evolution of the newest techniques

of sacrocolpopexy especially using the da Vinci surgical robotic system and we evaluate the current role of robotic sacrocolpopexy in

POP surgery as well.

Keywords: pelvic organ prolapse (POP), sacrocolpopexy, da Vinci robotic surgery

Published: May 1, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Struppl D. Da Vinci sacrocolpopexy in urogenital prolapse surgery. Endoskopie. 2011;20(1):24-28.
Download citation

References

  1. Raymond ChS, Rackley R, Appell RA. Incidence of concomitant procedures for pelvic organ prolapse and reconstruction in women who undergo surgery for stress urinary incontinence Urology 2001; 57(5): 911-913. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Olsen AL, Smith JV, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence Obstetrics & Gynekology 1997; 89(4): 501-506.
  3. McCall ML. Posterior culdoplasty: surgical correction of enterocele during vaginal hysterectomy: a preliminary report, Am J Obstet Gynecol 1957; 10: 595-602. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Richter K, Dargent D. Spinous fixation (vaginae fixatio sacrospinalis) in the treatment of vaginal prolapse after hysterectomy. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 1986; 15(8): 1081.
  5. Lovatsis D, Drutz HP. Safety and efficacy of sacrospinous vault suspension, Int. Urogynecol. J 2002; 13: 308-313. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Maher ChF. Abdominal sacral colpopexy or vaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vaginal vault prolapse: A prospective randomized study American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004; 190(1): 20-26. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Lantzsch T, Goepel C, Wolters M, Koelbl H, Methfessel HD. Sacrospinous ligament fixation for vaginal vault prolapse. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2001; 265(1): 21-25. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Meschia M, Bruschi F, Amicarelli F, Pifarotti P, Marchini M, Crosignani PG. The sacropinous vaginal vault suspension: critical analysis of outcomes, Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 1999; 10(3): 155-159. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Lane FE. Repair of posthysterectomy vaginal-vault prolapse. Obstet Gynecol 1962; 20: 72-77. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  10. Lefranc JP, Atallah D, Camatte S, Blondon J. Longterm follow up of posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse abdominal repair: a report of 85 cases Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2002; 195(3): 352-358. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Peggy MAJ, Geomini HAM. Brölmann Vaginal vault suspension by abdominal sacral colpopexy for prolapse: a follow up study of 40 patients European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2001; 94(2): 234-238. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Timmons MC, Addison WA, Addison SB, Cavenar MG. Abdominal sacral colpopexy in 163 women with posthysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse and enterocele. Evolution of operative techniques. J Reprod Med 1992; 37: 323-327. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Maloney JC, Dunton JC, Smith K. Repair of vaginal prolapse with abdominal sacropexy. J Reprod Med 1990; 35: 6-10. Go to original source...
  14. Valaitis SR, Stanton SL. Sacrocolpopexy: a retrospective study of a clinician's experience. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 518-522. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Dorsey JH, Cundiff G. Laparoscopic procedures for incontinence and prolapse Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 1994; 6: 223-230. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Wattiez A, Canis M, Alexandre F, et al. Laparoscopic Approach of Total Pelvic Prolapse. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 1995; 2: 59. Go to original source...
  17. Woodward A, Matthews C1, Hill A, Ramakrishnan V1, Gill E. Prospective evaluation of surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted colpo- and cervicosacropexy for the management of apical pelvic support defects IUGA/ICS meeting 2010.
  18. Paraiso MFR, Jelovsek JE, Frick A, Chen CCG, Barber MD. Conventional laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: a randomized controlled trial IUGA/ICS meeting 2010. Go to original source...
  19. Zimmern P. Robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy IUGA/ICS meeting 2010.
  20. Ciezki A, O'Reilly B, O'Sullivan S, Hewitt M. Robotic-assisted abdominal sacrocolpopexy/sacrohysteropexy (rasc) - a viable alternative for POP repair? IUGA/ICS meeting 2010.
  21. Weinstein M, Pulliam S, Wakamatsu M. Minimally-invasive sacral colpopexy: comparison of operative characteristics of laparoscopic and robotic approaches. IUGA/ICS 2010.
  22. Chan SS, Cheung TH, Cheung YKR, Yiu KWA. Experience of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy of a single urogynecology unit IUGA/ICS 2010.
  23. Geller EJ, Siddiqui NY, Wu JM, Visco AG. Short-term outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy compared with abdominal sacrocolpopexy. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112(6): 1201-1206. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Di Marco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS. Roboticassisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology. 2004; 63(2): 373-376. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Elliott DS, Krambeck AE, Chow GK. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. J Urol. 2006; 176(2): 655-659. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Endoscopy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.