Endoskopie 2009; 18(1): 28-36

daVinci robotic radical prostatectomy - our current technique and results

MUDr. Ivan Kolombo FEBU
Centrum robotické chirurgie a urologie Nemocnice Na Homolce, Praha

daVinci robotic radical prostatectomy is the most common urologic procedure in our Centre of robotic surgery in Hospital Na Homolce

Prague. We describe our current technique and evaluate our early experience with this novel robot-assisted laparoscopic technique for

radical prostatectomy that has been performed in patients with prostate cancer and with intent of curative treatment. The daVinci robotic

system makes it easier to move from open to laparoscopic technique. Minimally invasive robotic assisted technique enables to limit the

morbidity of open radical prostatectomy with shorter convalescence and safety for patients and shorter learning curve for surgeons.

Keywords: robotic surgery, daVinci robot, laparoscopy, minimally invasive surgery, oncological surgery, prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy.

Published: April 1, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kolombo I. daVinci robotic radical prostatectomy - our current technique and results. Endoskopie. 2009;18(1):28-36.
Download citation

References

  1. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures. Accessed 2009 Available at URL: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PRO/content/PRO_1_1x_Prostate_Cancer.pdf.asp?sitearea =PRO. Accessed 2009.
  2. Hsing AW, Teak L, Devisa SS. International trends and patterns of prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Int J Cancer 2000; 85: 60-67. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Boyle P, Ferlay J. Cancer incidence and mortality in Europe, 2004. Ann Oncol 2005; 481-488. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Ústav zdravotnických informací a statistiky ČR - ÚZIS ČR (Institute of health information and statistics of the Czech republic - IHIS CR) http://www.uzis.cz/news.php?mnu_ id=1000.
  5. Dušek L, Mužík J, Kubásek M, Koptíková J, Žaloudík J, Vyzula R. Epidemiologie zhoubných nádorů v České republice [online]. Masarykova univerzita, [2005], [cit. 2009-1-11]. Dostupný z WWW: http://www.svod.cz. Verze 7.0 [2007], ISSN 1802-8861.
  6. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 2007; 57: 43-66. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Catalona WJ, Han M. Definitive therapy for localized prostate cancer - an overview. In: Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, PArtin AW, Peters CA. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2007; 2932-2946.
  8. Lerner SE, Blute ML, Zincke H. Extended experience with radical prostatectomy for clinical stage T3 prostate cancer: outcome and contemporary morbidity. J Urol 1995; 154(4): 1447-1452. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Martínez de la Riva SI, López-Tomasety JB, Domínguez RM, Cruz EA, Blanco PS. Radical prostatectomy as monotherapy for locally advanced prostate cancer (T3a): 12 years followup. Arch Esp Urol 2004; 57: 679-692. Go to PubMed...
  10. Van Poppel H, Goethuys H, Callewaert P, Vanuytsel L, Van de Voorde W, Baert L. Radical prostatectomy can provide a cure for well-selected clinical stage T3 prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2000; 38(4): 372-379. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Jarolím L. Radikální retropubická prostatektomie. In: Žaloudík J, Vyzula R. Edukační sborník XXX. Brněnské onkologické dny. Brno: Masarykův onkologický ústav, 2006: 193-194.
  12. Walsh PC. Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. In: Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr., Sein AJ eds., Campbell´s Urology, Vol. 4, Chapt. 90. 8th ed. Philadeplphia: WB Saunders Co, 2002: 3107-3129.
  13. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997; 50(6): 854-857. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  14. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000; 163: 1643-1649. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  15. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: The Montsouris experience. J Urol 2000; 163: 418-422. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU 2001; 87: 408-410. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  17. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A. Laparscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J Urol 2002; 168: 945-949. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S, et al. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: Contemporative technique and analysis of results. Eur Urol 2007; 57: 648-658. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  19. Patel VR, Palmer KJ, Coughlin G, Samavedi S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J Endourol 2008; 22: 2299-2305. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Stolzenburg J, Rabenalt R, Do M, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN. Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: The university of Leipzig experience of 2000 cases. J Endourol 2008; 22: 2319-2325. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Rocco F, Carmignani L, Acquati P, et al. Restoration of posterior aspect of rhabdosphincter shortens continence time after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 2006; 175: 2201-2206. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Van Velthoven R, Abbou CC, Rassweiler J, Mottrie A, Erdogru T, Gill I, Menon M, Ahlering T. Multicentric survey about 5158 vesico-urethral anastomoses after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). Eu Urol. Suppl 2007; 6(2): 127 Abstract 418. Go to original source...
  23. Box GN, Ahlering TE. Robotic radical prostatectomy: longterm outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 2008; 18: 173-179. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Cathelineau X, Cahill D, Widmer H, Rozet F, Baumert H, Vallancien G. Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal approach for laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a false debate over a real challenge. J Urol 2004; 171(2 Pt 1): 714-716. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  25. Erdogru T, Teber D, Frede T, Marrero R, Hammady A, Seemann O, Rassweiler J. Comparison of transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using match-pair analysis. Eur Urol 2004; 46(3): 312-319. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  26. Montironi R, Mazzuccheli R, Scarpelli M, Lopez-Beltran A, Fellegara G, Algaba F. Gleason grading of prostate cancer in needle biopsies or radical prostatectomy specimens: contemporary apprroach, current clinical significance and sources of pathology discrepancies. BJU Int 2005; 95: 1146-1152. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Študent V, Král M, Soukeníková D, Kučerová L, Grepl M, Hrabec M. Is there any difference in Gleason score between prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimen in View of Conclusion of The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading? 28th Congress of the Societe Internationale d´Urologie (SIU) Cape Town 2006.
  28. Epstein JI, et al. The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) - Consensus Conference on Glea?son Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005; 29: 1228-1242. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Delongchamps NB, Singh A, Haas GP. The role of prevalence in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Cancer Control 2006; 13: 158-168. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Bott SR, Freeman AA, Stenning S, Cohen J, Parkinson MC. Radical prostatectomy: pathology findings in 1001 cases compared with other major series and over time. BJU Int 2005; 95(1): 34-39. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  31. Ward JF, Zincke H, Bergstralh EJ, Slezak JM, Myers RP, Blute ML. The impact of surgical approach (nerve bundle preservation versus wide local excision) on surgical margins and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004; 172(4 Pt 1): 1328-1332. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  32. Iversen P, Johansson J-E, Lodding P, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of bicalutamide in early non metastatic prostate cancor: latest findings from the Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group no 6 (SPCG-6) of the Early Prostate Cancer programme. Eur Urol Suppl 2006; 5: 251 (abstrakt no. 914). Go to original source...
  33. McLeod DG, Iversen P, See WA et al. Bicalutamide 150 mg plus standard care versus standard care alone for early prostate cancer. BJU Int 2006; 97: 247-254. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. McLeod DG, Wirth M, Iversen P, Armstrong J, Morris T, See WA. Bicalutamide 150 mg as adjutant to radical prostatectomy significantly improves progression-free survival in men with locally advanced prostate cancer. ASCO Prostate Cancer Symposium, San Francisco, CA 24-26 February 2006 (abstract no. 181).
  35. Messing E, et al. Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node positive prostate cancer: results at 10 years of EST 3886. J Urol 2003; 169: 396, abs 1480. Go to original source...
  36. Thompson IM Jr, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, Lucia MS, Miller G, Troyer D, Messing E, Forman J, Chin J, Swanson G, CanbyHagino E, Crawford ED: Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296(19): 2329-2335. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  37. Van der Kwast TH, Bolla M, Van Poppel H, Van Cangh P, Vekemans K, Da Pozzo L, Bosset JF, Kurth KH, Schröder FH, Collette L, EORTC 22911. Identification of patients with prostate cancer who benefit from immediate postoperative radiotherapy: EORTC 22911. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(27): 4178-4186. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  38. Van der Kwast TH, Collette L, Bolla M. Adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery for pathologically advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25(35): 5671-5672. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Spiotto MT, Hancock SL, King CR. Radiotherapy after prostatectomy: Improved biochemical relapse-free survival with whole pelvic compared with prostate bed only for high-risk patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 69: 54-61. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  40. Chen M, Dang HD, Wang JY, Zhou C, Li SY, Wang WC, Zhao WF, Yang ZH, Zhong CY, Li GZ. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined. Acta Radiol 2008; 49(5): 602-610. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  41. Mueller-Lisse UG, Scherr MK. Proton MR spectroscopy of the prostate. Eur J Radiol 2007; 63(3): 351-360. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. de Jong IJ, Breeuwsma AJ, Pruim J. Positron emission tomography in urology. EAU-EBU Update Series 2007; 5: 93-104. Go to original source...
  43. Scattoni V, Picchio N, Suardi N, Messa C, Freschi M, Roscigno M, Da Pozzo L, Bocciardi A, Rigatti P, Fazio F. Detection of Lymph-Node Metastase with Intergrated (11C) Choline PET/ CT in Patients with PSA Failure after Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: Results Confirmed by Open Pelvic-Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy. Eur Urol 2007; 2(52): 423-429. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  44. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2003; 170(5): 1738-1741. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  45. Borin JF, Skarecky DW, Narula N, Ahlering TE. Impact of urethral stump length on continence and positive surgical margins in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology 2007; 70: 173-177. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  46. Capello SA, Patel HR, Joseph JV. Surgical case order does not affect outcomes during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Robotic Surg 2008; 2: 25-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  47. Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Vallancien G. Robotic radical prostatectomy: the European experience. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31(4): 693-699. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  48. Patel VR, Tully AS, Holmes R, Lindsay J. Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting - the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. J Urol 2005; 174(1): 269-272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Tewari A, Raman JD, Chang P, Rao S, Divine G, Menon M. Long-term survival probability in men with clinically localized prostate cancer treated either conservatively or with definitive treatment (radiotheray or radical prostatectomy). Urology 2006; 68: 1268-1274. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Wolfram M, Bräutigam R, Engl T, Bentas W, Heitkamp S, Ostwald M, Kramer W, Binder J, Blaheta R, Jonas D, Beecken WD. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Frankfurt technique. World J Urol 2003; 21(3): 128-132. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  51. Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, et al. Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur Urol 2007; 51: 755-762. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...




Endoscopy

Madam, Sir,
please be aware that the website on which you intend to enter, not the general public because it contains technical information about medicines, including advertisements relating to medicinal products. This information and communication professionals are solely under §2 of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. Is active persons authorized to prescribe or supply (hereinafter expert).
Take note that if you are not an expert, you run the risk of danger to their health or the health of other persons, if you the obtained information improperly understood or interpreted, and especially advertising which may be part of this site, or whether you used it for self-diagnosis or medical treatment, whether in relation to each other in person or in relation to others.

I declare:

  1. that I have met the above instruction
  2. I'm an expert within the meaning of the Act n.40/1995 Coll. the regulation of advertising, as amended, and I am aware of the risks that would be a person other than the expert input to these sites exhibited


No

Yes

If your statement is not true, please be aware
that brings the risk of danger to their health or the health of others.